Property Law Assessment 1 Formal Legal Advice Essay

Property Law Assessment 1 Formal Legal Advice - Essay Example On his bed, he realises minimal chances of survival and calls for a meeting. He gives Sonya a cheque worth  £100,000 on his own current account and note meant to transfer ownership of his shares of the house to her. The main issue in this scenario is the gifts that Leo gives to Sonya. The transfer of ownership depends on whether Leo dies. An issue may arise where Leo recovers from the disease and Sonya is not ready to surrender the gifts (Lorberbaum, 2001, p. 46). 2 4. He gives Sharon the key to his tin box under his bed telling her the contents belonged to her. The main issue in this scenario is the transfer of the gifts that Leo gives to Sharon. The transfer of the property will not be possible if Leo recovers, and he gives since he realizes minimal chances of survival.3 5. He gave Ben his accountant’s business card, telling him to contact him and get ownership of all his share certificates, sell them and give the proceeds to Leo’s students in equal shares Siam (Legal International, 2001). An issue might arise concerning the authority to transfer ownership of share certificates. Ben must be convinced that Leo has approved the transfer.4 6. Leo recovers from the illness. A part of the roof falls on him on leaving for his first walk since the infection, and he dies instantly. The main issue in this scenario is the death of Leo. It is accidental, therefore, all the gifts that he had given out succeeds. 7. Ben arranges to sell the shares and spend the proceeds on a holiday. The main issue in the scenario is the sale of shares. Ben arranges to surrender his shareholding in the house which is possible since he is the legal owner of the house.5 2. The property concerning this scenario falls under estates. Donatio mortis causa is a method through which ownership of property passes without the need to comply with the formalities of Wills Acts when death occurs. The courts develop and extend the doctrine on a case-by-case basis. This results in the

Religious terrorists Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words

Religious terrorists - Essay Example In short, religious terrorists are different from secular terrorists because they feel that their deity is commanding them to commit these acts, in addition to having a â€Å"greater purpose† for their actions and wishing to cleanse the world of those that do not believe as they do. The religious terrorist finds justification in their actions by committing grave acts in the name of whatever deity they worship. They consider their act to be an act of duty to their deity, and to them, if it is necessary to give their own life in addition to the lives taken for this cause, then so be it. Consider, for example, the role of suicide bombers. Frequently, those bombers shout prayers before pushing the button that will end their life and others, as they believe that their life’s sacrifice, as part of the war that they are engaged in, is worth it. They believe that when they are dead, they will then automatically be favored in the eyes of their deity; therefore, their sacrifice w as not in vain as they were carrying out the commands given to them. Lives other than their own are also considered acceptable losses in the eyes of the religious terrorist, mainly because their psychosis and/or underlying psychological issues have caused them to believe that everyone would like to die as well, but because their deity has commanded them to do so. Though these persons are most likely suffering from psychosis, such as paranoid schizophrenia or delusions, in their eyes they feel that their deity has commanded them to take these lives, and if necessary, their own. ... Religious terrorists differ from secular terrorists due to the lengths that they are willing to go to achieve their agenda. They believe, whether through psychosis or brainwashing, that they are the only ones that shall inherit the earth, and everyone else must die. It is not enough for the religious terrorist to simply banish those thought of, in their mind, as unclean, unworthy, or otherwise non-favored individuals. Their very existence must be wiped from the earth and the world, never to rise again, and they must not be permitted to spread, for those who believe as the religious terrorist does are the only ones that can be allowed to live. This reason is, I think, the biggest difference between religious and secular terrorists. Religious terrorists are willing to wipe out large portions of people; usually, secular terrorists are not. Though there are incidents of mass destruction when it comes to secular terrorists, without any religious agenda involved, religious terrorists, agai n, believe that they have been commanded to do these works by their deity, while secular terrorists usually do not see the value in mass killings or even mass destruction, as it is usually better (in their opinion) to attack a tactical or strategic target, such as a building. Their attacks are usually small and to the point, seeking to get a point across. For example, while they go after a target, they are not likely to kill anyone else around the primary target. To the religious terrorist, his or her point of view is the only view. You must believe as they do, or you must die. No amount of talking or negotiating will help; different beliefs must be wiped away. This makes the religious